| Votes | By | Price | Discipline | Year Launched |
| eLABInventory | FREE | Interdisciplinary |
SciSure is a unified scientific-management platform described as the “Scientific Management Platform (SMP)” that brings together electronic laboratory notebook (ELN), laboratory information management system (LIMS), and environmental health & safety (EHS) tools into a single integrated system. It was created through the merger of eLabNext and SciShield, combining research workflow tools and compliance/safety systems.
Who it serves and how
SciSure is designed for research laboratories, biotech companies, academic institutions, and lab-operations teams seeking to streamline their workflows, ensure compliance, and integrate data across previously disconnected systems.
- For scientists: It offers structured experiment documentation, collaboration features, and audit-ready records.
- For lab operations: It provides inventory and sample tracking, equipment management, chain-of-custody logging.
- For EHS and safety teams: It supports chemical/biological hazard tracking, safety audits, risk management and regulatory compliance (ISO 27001, 21 CFR Part 11, GxP, GDPR) built in.
Key features & value proposition
- Unified platform: One system covers ELN + LIMS + EHS rather than separate tools, reducing fragmentation and manual hand-offs.
- Workflow integration: Manuals, spreadsheets and standalone systems replaced by a consistent, searchable and audit-capable workflow.
- Compliance readiness: Built-in regulatory frameworks (electronic records, audit trails, safety documentation) to support labs working under regulated environments.
- Scalability & integration: The platform claims to support more than 550,000 users across 40,000+ labs globally, illustrating its reach.
Considerations
- As a comprehensive platform, adoption may require organisational change: migrating from legacy systems, training staff and aligning workflows can take time.
- Compatibility and integration with existing instrumentation, data sources and local IT infrastructure should be assessed: while prebuilt integrations are available, labs with very custom setups may require additional work.
- Cost and licensing: For full enterprise features (especially in regulated labs) budget and support models should be reviewed carefully.
- For smaller or highly specialised labs with minimal regulatory burden, the full breadth of features may exceed immediate needs—lighter tools may suffice until scaling is required.
